How Does an Earnout Work in a Business Acquisition?
An earnout can bridge a real gap between what a buyer thinks a business is worth and what a seller believes it will become, but it also creates one of the most common sources of post-closing disputes.
By Simon Touma · Updated August 14, 2026
What Is an Earnout and Why Is It Used in a Business Sale?
Quick answer: An earnout structures part of the purchase price as contingent future payments, based on the acquired business hitting specific financial targets after closing, rather than paying the full price upfront. It is typically used to bridge a valuation gap, when a buyer and seller disagree about future performance, or to keep a seller financially motivated to help transition the business successfully.
On This Page
- What Is an Earnout and Why Is It Used in a Business Sale?
- Why Buyers and Sellers Use Earnouts
- How Earnout Targets Are Typically Structured
- Why Earnouts Are a Common Source of Disputes
- Provisions That Help Prevent Earnout Disputes
- What Sellers Should Watch For
- What Buyers Should Watch For
- Structuring a Fairer Earnout: Practical Steps
- When an Earnout Dispute Becomes Litigation
- FAQs
Why Buyers and Sellers Use Earnouts
Earnouts often come into play when a seller believes the business is worth more based on its growth trajectory, while a buyer is more cautious, unwilling to pay for potential that has not yet been proven. An earnout lets both sides move forward, the seller gets a chance to earn the higher value if their optimism proves correct, and the buyer only pays the premium if the results actually materialize.
Earnouts are also used to keep a departing owner financially invested in a smooth transition, if a meaningful portion of their payout depends on post-closing performance, they have a real incentive to help the business succeed under new ownership rather than simply walking away after signing.
Awards & Recognition
Founding Partners Michael Tamou and Simon Touma’s business acquisition litigation work has been independently recognized, earned, never purchased.
How Earnout Targets Are Typically Structured
Earnout payments are usually tied to specific, measurable metrics, revenue targets, EBITDA thresholds, customer retention, or other performance benchmarks, over a defined period after closing, often one to three years. The metric chosen matters enormously, since it defines exactly what triggers additional payment and what does not.
Why Earnouts Are a Common Source of Disputes
The seller no longer controls how the business is run after closing, but their earnout payment depends on its performance. This creates a real, structural tension: what if the new owner makes decisions, cutting marketing spend, changing pricing, integrating operations differently, that happen to reduce the metrics the earnout depends on, whether or not that was the intent?
Disputes commonly arise over exactly this issue, sellers arguing the buyer’s post-closing decisions were made specifically to suppress the earnout, buyers arguing they simply ran the business as they saw fit within their rights as the new owner.
Provisions That Help Prevent Earnout Disputes
Well-drafted earnout provisions typically include specific operating covenants, commitments about how the business will be run during the earnout period, restrictions on certain actions that could unfairly suppress the metrics, and detailed definitions of exactly how the relevant metrics will be calculated and reported.
Clear audit rights, letting the seller verify the numbers used to calculate their earnout, and a defined dispute resolution process for disagreements over the calculation, are also worth negotiating upfront rather than discovering you need them after a dispute has already started.
What Sellers Should Watch For
Sellers relying on an earnout for a significant portion of the purchase price should push hard for operating covenants limiting the buyer’s ability to make decisions that would suppress the metrics, and for real transparency into how the business is actually being run during the earnout period.
What Buyers Should Watch For
Buyers should make sure the earnout structure genuinely reflects the value being paid for, and does not create operational restrictions so tight they cannot reasonably integrate or run the acquired business the way they need to.
Structuring a Fairer Earnout: Practical Steps
- Choose metrics that are objective and hard to manipulate, revenue is often clearer than more subjective profitability measures.
- Define calculation methodology precisely in the agreement itself, not left to later interpretation.
- Include specific operating covenants protecting the seller’s ability to actually earn the payment.
- Build in audit and reporting rights so the seller can verify the numbers.
- Address what happens if the business is sold again during the earnout period.
When an Earnout Dispute Becomes Litigation
When a seller believes a buyer manipulated the business specifically to avoid an earnout payment, or when the parties simply cannot agree on how a metric should be calculated, this often becomes real litigation, frequently turning on the precise contract language negotiated at the outset. This is exactly why the drafting stage matters so much, and why experienced counsel on both sides of an earnout provision pays for itself.
Negotiating or disputing an earnout in Arizona? Talk to our litigation team before you respond.
Call 602-932-6010Related Practice Areas
Business Acquisition, Sale, and RestructuringBusiness Transactions and ContractsHow Does an Earnout Work in a Business Acquisition? FAQs
Are earnouts common in small business acquisitions?
They appear across deal sizes, though they are more common in situations with real valuation uncertainty or when the seller’s continued involvement matters to a smooth transition.
What happens if the buyer sells the business during the earnout period?
This should be addressed explicitly in the agreement, without specific provisions, a sale mid-earnout can create real complications for calculating and collecting the remaining payment.
Can a seller sue if they believe an earnout was unfairly suppressed?
Yes, this is one of the more common sources of post-acquisition litigation, and the outcome often depends heavily on the specific contract language and operating covenants that were negotiated.
What metrics are typically used for earnout targets?
Revenue, EBITDA, gross profit, and customer retention are common, the right choice depends on the business and what both sides can agree is fair and measurable.
How long do earnout periods typically last?
Commonly one to three years, though this varies based on the specific deal and what makes sense for the business’s performance cycle.
Should I get an earnout in cash upfront instead if possible?
This depends on your risk tolerance and how much you trust the post-closing performance projections, an all-cash upfront deal eliminates earnout risk entirely but may result in a lower total potential payout.
Do I need special contract language to protect an earnout?
Yes, generic language is a common source of later disputes, specific operating covenants and calculation methodology should be carefully negotiated.
What if the buyer and seller simply disagree on the earnout calculation?
A well-drafted agreement should include a specific dispute resolution mechanism for exactly this situation, without one, this often ends up in litigation.
Key Takeaways
- Earnouts bridge valuation gaps by tying part of the purchase price to future performance.
- The structural tension between buyer control and seller payout is the core source of earnout disputes.
- Operating covenants and clear calculation methodology significantly reduce dispute risk.
- Earnout disputes often turn on precise contract language, making careful drafting essential.
Visit Us
