Skip to main content

How Does Comparative Negligence Apply to Motorcycle Accidents?

Representation You Can Trust. No Matter What.

Schedule a Free ConsultationCall (602) 932-6010
By August 15th, 2026Uncategorized
Motorcycle Accidents

How Does Comparative Negligence Apply to Motorcycle Accidents?

Riders often face an uphill fight on fault, comparative negligence is the rule that keeps that fight from being all-or-nothing.

By Simon Touma · Updated August 14, 2026

5.0 on Google · Super Lawyers 2025 · Free Consultation
Michael Tamou, Founding Partner of Arizona Litigation Group

Michael Tamou

Founding Partner

Simon Touma, Founding Partner of Arizona Litigation Group

Simon Touma

Founding Partner

Can a Motorcyclist Recover Damages Even if Partly at Fault?

Quick answer: Yes. Arizona’s pure comparative negligence rule (A.R.S. § 12-2505) applies to motorcycle accidents the same as any other, your recovery is reduced by your percentage of fault, but not eliminated, even if insurers or juries assign riders a disproportionate share of blame.

Courtroom Experience, Not Just Contracts

When you hire Arizona Litigation Group, PLLC, you hire attorneys who try cases, not just draft documents. Aggressive litigation, no excuses, is the standard on every file, from initial demand letter through trial.

Founding Partners Michael Tamou and Simon Touma have built a track record of proven results defending and pursuing business disputes across Arizona, including litigation teams that obtained multi-million dollar results in complex civil cases. Every client gets that same litigation-first mindset, whether the goal is a fast resolution or a fight in front of a judge.

The Same Rule, a Harder Fight

Arizona’s pure comparative negligence rule under A.R.S. § 12-2505 applies equally to motorcycle accidents. The legal framework is identical to a car accident case, though riders often face a real uphill battle due to bias against motorcyclists in fault determinations.

Because Arizona is a pure comparative negligence state, there is no cutoff percentage that bars recovery entirely, even a rider assigned significant fault can still recover the remaining share of damages from the other driver.

Awards & Recognition

Founding Partners Michael Tamou and Simon Touma’s personal injury litigation work has been independently recognized, earned, never purchased.

Common Ways Insurers Try to Inflate Rider Fault

Insurers frequently argue speed, lane position, or “visibility” issues to shift blame onto the rider, sometimes without strong evidentiary support, understanding this pattern helps in building a case that counters it directly.

Some adjusters lean on the general perception that motorcycles are inherently dangerous or that riders take on more risk, rather than on the specific facts of the crash itself. Recognizing this pattern early helps in responding to it effectively.

Why Strong Evidence Matters Even More Here

Because riders already face this uphill fight, objective evidence, camera footage, witness statements, accident reconstruction, carries extra weight in accurately establishing fault percentages rather than allowing assumptions to drive the outcome.

How This Affects Your Recovery

Just like any other accident, your total damages are reduced by your assigned fault percentage, not eliminated, so contesting an inflated fault percentage directly protects the value of your claim. A 20-percentage-point difference in an assigned fault figure can represent a very real dollar difference in your final recovery.

How an Attorney Approaches a Disputed Fault Percentage

An experienced attorney will typically gather all available evidence, camera footage, the police report, witness accounts, and where warranted, accident reconstruction, to build an accurate picture of what actually happened, rather than accepting an insurer’s initial fault assessment at face value.

Steps to Take If You’re Facing an Inflated Fault Argument

  1. Do not accept a fault percentage from the insurer without review.
  2. Gather and preserve all available evidence as early as possible.
  3. Avoid recorded statements that could be used to support an inflated fault claim.
  4. Have an attorney evaluate the insurer’s position against the actual facts.

Facing a fault dispute after a motorcycle accident in Arizona? Talk to our litigation team before you respond.

Call 602-932-6010
Common Questions

How Does Comparative Negligence Apply to Motorcycle Accidents? FAQs

Do motorcyclists face different fault rules than car drivers in Arizona?

No, the legal rule (comparative negligence) is the same, though riders often face practical bias in how fault gets assigned.

What if the insurance company says I was 60% at fault?

This is not final, you can dispute it with evidence, and even if some fault is assigned, you can still recover the remaining percentage.

Can wearing protective gear affect my fault percentage?

Generally no, gear relates to injury severity, not who caused the accident.

How do I counter an insurer’s fault argument?

Strong evidence, camera footage, witness statements, and reconstruction where needed, is the most effective way to counter an inflated fault claim.

Is there a fault percentage that completely bars my claim?

No, Arizona’s pure comparative negligence rule under A.R.S. § 12-2505 means there is no cutoff, you can still recover your remaining percentage regardless of your assigned share.

Why do insurers seem to target motorcyclists with higher fault percentages?

Some rely on general assumptions about motorcycle risk rather than the specific facts of the crash, which is why contesting the assessment with evidence matters.

Can a small change in my fault percentage really affect my settlement much?

Yes, even a modest percentage shift can represent a significant dollar difference in your final recovery.

Key Takeaways

  • The same comparative negligence rule applies to motorcycle accidents as any other.
  • Riders often face practical bias that inflates their assigned fault percentage.
  • Fault percentages can be disputed with strong evidence.
  • Even partial fault does not eliminate your right to recover damages.

Visit Us

Arizona Litigation Group · Phoenix Office

3101 N. Central Ave., Suite 610-A

Phoenix, AZ 85012

602-932-6010Get Directions →
The information on this page is for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by reading this page or submitting a contact form. Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Leave a Reply